The Supreme Law personal privacy prohibited human exposure or celebrity post responsibility

The Supreme Law personal privacy prohibited human exposure or celebrity post responsibility

 

maximum ban human flesh search exposure personal privacy

 

supreme judicial interpretation of the norms of network infringement cases trial

, the Supreme People’s Court published on the 9 "the Supreme People’s Court on Several Issues concerning the application of laws against civil disputes over human rights using the information network" provisions of the judicial interpretation, will take effect on October 10th.

the introduction of the judicial interpretation of the provisions, network users or network service providers using the Internet to open natural genetic information, medical records, health examination records, criminal records, home address, private activities, personal privacy and other personal information, causing damage to another person, the infringee demands the tort liability, the people’s court shall support.

addition, judicial interpretation of the provisions of infringement of personal rights infringement caused by the loss of property or the infringer therefore benefits cannot be determined, the people’s court according to the specific case in the range of 500 thousand yuan in determining the amount of compensation."

focus 1 personal privacy ban human exposure

supreme law spokesman Sun Jungong said that in the Internet era, personal information, especially the protection of personal information is facing many challenges. The collection of personal information is almost everywhere, the connotation of personal information is becoming more and more abundant, and the scope is wider and wider. Therefore, the protection of personal information on the Internet is an important task of the judiciary.

according to the "Regulations", the network user or network service provider using the Internet to open natural genetic information, medical records, health examination records, criminal records, home address, private activities, personal privacy and other personal information, causing damage to others, the infringee demands the tort liability, the court shall support.

The

clause also specifically lists the exceptions, including the written consent of the natural person and open within the prescribed scope, in order to promote the public interest and the natural person in the necessary range, to the public on the network information or other legitimate public personal information, legal channels to obtain personal information etc..

Professor Gu Peidong

of Sichuan University law school believes that in the current Internet, based on private purpose of the "human flesh search" has appeared, infringement of personal information is likely to be published on the Internet, it is disturbing to many infringement. The provisions of the "provisions" in fact from the legal point of view on this behavior constraints, on the other hand to regulate this behavior.

[case] because of suspicion of a high school student in a clothing store trying to steal a clothes, the defendant Cai Xiaoqing will Xu in the store’s video screenshot uploaded to micro-blog. More than an hour later, >

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *